Quantum Computing

The interesting thing about Tim Palmer’s new argument on quantum computing is not the headline-friendly claim that the field may run into a hard limit.

Quantum computing may finally be approaching the least glamorous maturity signal imaginable: serious buyers are asking where the machine goes, how it plugs into existing infrastructure, and whether owning one makes more sense than renting time in the cloud.

The interesting part of New York University's new “time crystal” is not that it breaks Newton's third law.

IBM and Cleveland Clinic did not just “simulate a protein,” despite the cheerful fog machine around the announcement.

QuSecure has a real post-quantum banking pilot to point to.

Quantum coherence headlines are usually where precision goes to die.

Silicon quantum computing keeps promising that manufacturability will save it.

Oxford's latest ZX-calculus paper is not a new quantum decoder, and that is exactly why it matters.

Quantum computing does not get less noisy because a paper learns a longer adjective.

A new Australian "quantum battery" result looks real, and the phrase "ultra fast charging" still deserves adult supervision.

Italy’s antitrust authority is not investigating quantum computing because useful fault-tolerant machines have suddenly arrived.