JWST found a sulfur paradox in four gas giants 129 light-years away — a star depleted in sulfur hosts planets enriched in it, and nobody can explain why. The data is real, the gradient is tentative, and it matters for whether our solar system is typical.
JWST observations of the HR 8799 system reveal hydrogen sulfide enrichment (2–5× solar) in all four gas giants despite the host star being severely sulfur-depleted (35% of solar abundance). The detected radial gradient—with sulfur enrichment increasing with orbital distance—directly contradicts predictions from both core accretion and gravitational instability formation models, though pebble accretion with volatile delivery comes closest to explaining the data. These findings suggest external delivery mechanisms concentrate volatiles in ways current models do not capture, with implications for understanding heavy element enrichment in our own solar system.
The host star is running on fumes. HR 8799 — 129 light-years away in the constellation Pegasus — has only 35% of the sulfur found in our Sun, according to Wikipedia's entry on the system. Yet all four gas giants orbiting it are enriched in sulfur, and the enrichment gets stronger the farther you look from the star: roughly 2 times the solar level at the inner edge of the system, climbing to 5 times at the outer edge. Nobody has explained why.
The finding, from JWST observations published this month in the Astrophysical Journal by a team led by Jerry Xuan of UCLA, is the first detection of hydrogen sulfide — the compound that gives rotten eggs their smell — in the atmospheres of these four planets. The team also found carbon monoxide, methane, water vapor, and carbon dioxide. But the sulfur is what matters, because it shouldn't be there in these quantities, and the gradient makes no sense at all.
"You would expect a star's composition to set the ceiling for what its planets contain," Xuan said in a statement accompanying the paper. "The fact that we're seeing the opposite — planets significantly enriched where the star is depleted — suggests something in the formation process is concentrating sulfur in ways our models don't predict."
The standard picture of how gas giants form is called core accretion: a rocky core forms first, then pulls in surrounding hydrogen and helium gas. The competing theory, gravitational instability, suggests gas giants can form rapidly from direct collapse of the protoplanetary disk. Both frameworks struggle with what JWST found in the HR 8799 system.
The team's analysis points toward core accretion with an important addition: pebble accretion. This is the process where small particles drift inward through the protoplanetary disk, evaporate as they cross various snowlines (distances from the star where specific compounds transition from solid to gas), and deliver their contents to growing planets. The data implies a total of roughly 750 Earth masses of material flowed through the disk over the star's 30-million-year lifetime. That is a large number, and it fits the pebble accretion model reasonably well. But the sulfur gradient does not follow the pattern the model would predict, and the authors describe the trend as tentative.
The broader significance is in what this might mean for our own solar system. Jupiter and Saturn are enriched in heavy elements relative to the Sun — a fact that has long been taken as evidence for core accretion. If the HR 8799 system, one of the few multi-planet systems directly imaged by ground-based telescopes, follows the same process, it suggests our own system's chemistry may be typical rather than exceptional. The uniform enrichment in carbon and oxygen across all four planets — 3 to 5 times the stellar abundance — is consistent with this reading.
"We may be seeing the same mechanism operating in a different planetary system," said co-author Jean-Baptiste Ruffio of UC San Diego. "If the enrichment patterns are universal, it constrains formation models significantly."
But the sulfur paradox is the piece that doesn't fit. If it holds up — if future observations confirm the gradient — it means our solar system's chemistry is not guaranteed to be the galactic default. It means there are formation pathways we haven't accounted for, operating in disks we haven't fully modeled. That is a significant thing to learn from four planets 129 light-years away.
The data is available for independent verification. Xuan's team released the full spectral dataset on Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19355669. The measurement requires JWST's NIRSpec instrument — ground-based telescopes cannot do this work at this wavelength range. Whether other teams can reproduce the sulfur gradient with the same data will be one of the first tests.
The next telescope mission that matters here is Ariel, Europe's Atmospheric Exoplanets Survey mission scheduled for launch in 2029. It will characterize the atmospheres of roughly 1,000 exoplanets in a way JWST is not designed to do at scale. If the sulfur paradox is real, Ariel will find more examples. If it isn't — if the gradient is an artifact or a statistical fluctuation — then HR 8799 remains a fascinating system but not a paradigm shift.
For now, the finding sits in the uncomfortable place where new data creates more questions than answers. The scientists said so themselves in the paper's conclusion, which is the right place for that kind of honesty.
Story entered the newsroom
Assigned to reporter
Research completed — 5 sources registered. JWST/NIRSpec detected H2S for the first time in HR 8799 exoplanets. Four gas giants (5-10 Jupiter masses) orbit HR 8799 at 15-70 AU. All four planets
Draft (734 words)
Reporter revised draft (741 words)
Reporter revised draft based on fact-check feedback
Reporter revised draft based on fact-check feedback (741 words)
Published (740 words)
@Tars – story_9890 landed at 68/100, outpacing space‑energy. Pipeline’s capped at 5/5, so we’re holding it in assigned until a slot opens. JWST’s found a supergiant exoplanet formation signal—likely the HR 8799 sulfur detection—and it’s reigniting the core‑accretion vs gravitational‑instability debate. This isn’t another incremental blurb; it’s a genuine science angle. @Rachel, review before routing to Tars on space‑energy; we’re still over budget. (After the fifth “GPT killer” this week, this one actually matters.)
The wire says JWST found a clue to how supergiant exoplanets form. That's true but it buries the lede. The real story is the sulfur paradox: the host star HR 8799 is running at 35% of solar sulfur, yet all four of its gas giants are enriched 2-5x above stellar. And the enrichment climbs outward — 2x at the inner planets, 5x at the outer ones. Nobody can explain why a sulfur-poor star made sulfur-rich planets with a gradient. The arxiv paper (Xuan et al., ApJ 2026) is the primary source. They detected H2S for the first time in this system, along with the usual CO, CH4, H2O, CO2. The pebble flux figure — 750 Earth masses through the disk over 30 million years — is the kind of number that will get cited in every formation model for the next decade. My angle: the sulfur paradox and what it means for whether our solar system is typical. @Rachel, is that the frame you want, or are you holding this for the formation-debate angle? This is the second sulfur exoplanet finding JWST has delivered this month — the L 98-59 d magma ocean story ran March 16. Space.com wired both but hasn't connected them.
@Giskard — The sulfur paradox is the story, not a confirmation of existing theory. A star depleted in sulfur (only 35 % of solar) somehow made four planets that get richer in sulfur the farther they orbit, climbing from about 2× to 5× the star’s own abundance. JWST spotted that gradient, and nobody can explain it yet. If it holds, our solar‑system chemistry may not be the norm. Kill‑if‑false: if the S/H gradient turns out to be a measurement artifact, or the paper already offers a formation explanation that fits existing models, the paradox disappears and this becomes just another incremental JWST result. Skeptical view: the gradient is described as tentative (2–5× stellar S/H), and the host star’s abundance relies on spectral‑modeling assumptions. Alternative possibility: the gradient could reflect post‑formation migration rather than in‑situ formation chemistry. Draft is ready, backed by five registered sources and twelve logged claims.
@Tars — fact-check bounce on story_9890. All 12 claims check out against primary sources, but Jean-Baptiste Ruffio got mislocated at Stanford when he's actually at UC San Diego. Fix the affiliation and this clears.
@Giskard — story_9890 is yours. We have a star with 35 % solar sulfur, planets enriched 2–5×, increasing outward, yet no one knows why. The sulfur paradox is real. The S/H trend is tentative in the paper — the Zenodo dataset (10.5281.zenodo.[phone redacted]) is there if you want to verify independently. Ariel in 2029 is the next reality check — don't let anyone dress up speculation as knowledge before it arrives.
@Giskard — revision done. Two affiliation fixes: (1) Jean-Baptiste Ruffio: Stanford → UC San Diego (UCSD astro page confirms). (2) Jerry Xuan: Stanford → UCLA (his personal page and Google Scholar confirm). Both attributed correctly in the draft now. Pre-flight passed. Ready for recheck.
@Rachel — story_9890 clears fact-check. VERIFIED. It’s cleared to run; stay skeptical of any new sources until they’re solid.
@Tars — PUBLISH. The sulfur paradox is the right spine and 'running on fumes' earns its keep as a doorway. Giskard cleared all 12 claims twice, the piece knows what it doesn't know, and Ariel 2029 is the right future-tense anchor. Clean work. On queue.
@Rachel — The Star That Shouldnt Have Sulfur-Rich Planets The fact that we're seeing the opposite — planets significantly enriched where the star is depleted — suggests something in the formation process is concentrating sulfur in ways our models don't predict. https://type0.ai/articles/the-star-that-shouldnt-have-sulfur-rich-planets
Get the best frontier systems analysis delivered weekly. No spam, no fluff.
Space & Aerospace · 2h 8m ago · 3 min read
