China's most credible open-source AI lab is being pulled into the orbit of its two most powerful tech companies — and what happens next will test whether US export controls can slow China's push toward frontier AI.
Reuters reported Wednesday that Tencent and Alibaba are in discussions to invest in DeepSeek at a valuation above $20 billion. Four people familiar with the discussions confirmed the talks. Five days earlier, DeepSeek had been targeting a $10 billion valuation in its first external round — a target that now looks like a floor, not a ceiling, as the two tech giants compete for a stake in the lab that shocked the AI world with its lean, open approach to frontier development.
Until now, DeepSeek operated without venture capital, strategic investors, or external board members. Its parent company, High-Flyer Capital Management, has funded the lab entirely from its own returns since 2023. High-Flyer reportedly posted a 56.6% return in 2025, enough to support research — but the escalating cost of frontier AI has outpaced what a single hedge fund, however successful, can sustain. Opening the cap table changes what DeepSeek is.
The pressure to raise is real. DeepSeek's next flagship model, V4, remains unreleased as of late April 2026, after multiple delays tied partly to compute constraints. One analysis from TokenMix notes DeepSeek had planned to train V4 on Huawei's Ascend 910B chips but encountered hardware failures during training, forcing an emergency pivot to NVIDIA H20 GPUs — per OSINT researchers tracking DeepSeek's public repositories — a less powerful alternative constrained by US export controls. The architecture shift added time and cost to a release originally expected in early 2026.
That pivot is where the export control story lives in miniature. DeepSeek's previous model, V3, was trained on roughly 2.79 million GPU hours on H800 chips — a less restricted NVIDIA part — at an estimated cost of about $5.6 million, a fraction of what Western labs spend. V4 was supposed to run partly on Huawei's Ascend stack, an alternative that would have made the export control regime largely irrelevant for DeepSeek's trajectory. The Huawei chip's failure in training means DeepSeek has had to fall back on NVIDIA H20s — US-restricted, but not unavailable. Whether that fallback is a temporary inconvenience or a structural constraint is the question US policymakers are now watching.
The deal also arrives alongside intensifying pressure from US AI companies. In February, Anthropic accused DeepSeek, along with Moonshot AI and MiniMax, of running coordinated campaigns to harvest outputs from its Claude model through a technique known as distillation — using a more capable system's responses to rapidly improve a competing model. Anthropic alleged the three firms used more than 24,000 fraudulent accounts to extract 16 million exchanges. OpenAI made similar accusations, sending a memo to the House Select Committee on China that described DeepSeek as using distillation and obfuscated routers to extract data from its models. DeepSeek has not publicly responded to the allegations.
Those accusations complicate the investment narrative. Tencent and Alibaba are not merely betting on a promising AI lab — they are acquiring a company under active scrutiny from the US AI establishment, sitting at the center of a dispute over how frontier AI capabilities are built and transferred.
If the deal closes, DeepSeek's open-weight models — the released model weights that anyone can run and modify — become the likely foundation for AI services across Tencent and Alibaba's cloud platforms, WeChat Cloud and Alibaba Cloud respectively. That distribution reach is something no independent DeepSeek had access to before. It is also something no amount of chip exporting ever would have bought.
The deal is not signed. Valuation and terms remain in negotiation. But the direction is clear. Three years of operating without external investors, beholden to no board and no strategic partner, appears to be ending. What replaces it is a company two of China's most powerful internet companies want to own — and that US policymakers bet they could keep apart.