Astronomers have confirmed a second planet actively forming in a young planetary system 437 light-years away — and they caught it the same way you'd separate a firefly from a spotlight: extremely precise hardware.
WISPIT 2 is a five-million-year-old star, young enough that its planets are still assembling. Researchers had already found one gas giant in the system, WISPIT 2b, orbiting at 57 AU. The second, WISPIT 2c, sits four times closer in, at 14 AU, and a new study published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters confirms it as a genuine protoplanet — not a disk artifact, not a background object. It is the second multi-planet formation system ever directly observed. The first is PDS 70. That system was confirmed in 2018.
The detection relied on GRAVITY+, an upgraded instrument on the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope Interferometer, which combines light from four 8.2-meter telescopes into a virtual aperture with a 130-meter baseline. The upgrade that made WISPIT 2c detectable was GRAVITY+'s extreme Adaptive Optics system, which corrects atmospheric distortion at a speed and precision that did not exist in this configuration a few years ago. Without that hardware, the detection does not happen. Co-author Guillaume Bourdarot of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics put it plainly in the ESO press release: "without which we would not have been able to get such a clear detection of the planet so close to its star."
The GRAVITY data delivered more than a point source. The team extracted a medium-resolution K-band spectrum of WISPIT 2c and found CO band-head absorption at 2.3 microns — molecular carbon monoxide in the planet's atmosphere, still hot from formation. This is the kind of detail you can only get by staring directly at the forming planet rather than inferring it from the disk. The effective temperature is constrained to 1500–2600 K, the radius to roughly 0.9–2.2 Jupiter radii. Mass is estimated at 8–12 Jupiter masses by comparison with evolutionary tracks, roughly double WISPIT 2b. The GRAVITY astrometry also rules out a background object and marginally detects orbital motion, though follow-up observations are needed to confirm the orbit.
The mass estimate carries a caveat worth stating plainly: it comes from evolutionary models, not from the dynamical measurement the astrometry is still too sparse to provide with precision. The paper acknowledges this. It is the honest version of the number.
What makes WISPIT 2 scientifically unusual is the disk. Unlike PDS 70, whose inner disk cavity is relatively clean, WISPIT 2 has a highly structured disk with multiple rings and gaps. That architecture implies something is actively sculpting it — and the working assumption is that the two confirmed planets, and possibly a third, are doing the carving. Lead author Chloe Lawlor, a PhD student at the University of Galway, said WISPIT 2 is "the best look into our own past that we have to date." Her co-author Christian Ginski noted that WISPIT 2 gives astronomers "a critical laboratory not just to observe the formation of a single planet but an entire planetary system."
There is a third gap in the outer disk, narrower and shallower than the ones harboring the two confirmed planets. The team suspects a Saturn-mass object may be responsible. Confirmation will require more observation time on the VLTI or, eventually, the Extremely Large Telescope.
The significance of GRAVITY+ for the field deserves emphasis. Direct imaging of mature planets in reflected light is hard enough. Doing spectroscopy on a planet that is 5 million years old, embedded in a protoplanetary disk, at 14 AU from a young Sun-analogue — that is a different category of difficulty. The instrument upgrade was not incremental. The paper itself notes the GRAVITY+ extreme Adaptive Optics system was the enabling factor for this class of detection.
This is now the only star other than PDS 70 where two forming planets have been directly confirmed in the same system. That is not a crowded list. The gap between PDS 70 in 2018 and WISPIT 2 in 2026 reflects how difficult these observations are — and how dependent the field is on the next generation of instruments. The science is compelling. So is the hardware that made it possible.